When it comes to choosing the right running shoes, it’s important to consider factors such as comfort, cushioning, stability, and overall performance.
Two popular options in the market are the Brooks Glycerin 20 and the Saucony Triumph 20.
In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the key features and characteristics of both shoes to help you make an informed decision.
Tech – Comparison Table
| Features | Brooks Glycerin 20 | Saucony Triumph 20 |
| Cushioning | DNA LOFT midsole with Super DNA technology | PWRRUN+ midsole with PWRRUN PB cushioning |
| Upper Material | Engineered mesh with 3D Fit Print overlays | Engineered mesh with FORMFIT technology |
| Weight | Approximately 10.3 ounces (men’s) / 8.6 ounces (women’s) | Approximately 10.3 ounces (men’s) / 9.0 ounces (women’s) |
| Stack Height | 31mm (Heel), 21mm (Forefoot) | 33mm (Heel), 25mm (Forefoot) |
| Drop | 10mm | 8mm |
| Fit | Medium to high volume | Medium to high volume |
| Stability | Neutral | Neutral |
| Outsole | Durable and flexible rubber | Durable and flexible rubber |
| Traction | Reliable on various surfaces | Reliable on various surfaces |
| Toe Box | Roomy toe box | Roomy toe box |
| Arch Support | Neutral | Neutral |
| Breathability | High | High |
| Durability | Durable construction for long-lasting performance | Durable construction for long-lasting performance |
| Versatility | Suitable for daily training and long-distance running | Suitable for daily training and long-distance running |
| Recommended Use | Road running, daily training, and fitness activities | Road running, daily training, and long-distance runs |
| Check the latest price on Amazon – For Men – For Women | Check the latest price on Amazon – For Men – For Women |
You May Also Like – Brooks Adrenaline GTS 22 VS Brooks Glycerin GTS 20: Which is Better
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is paramount when selecting running shoes, as it directly affects your running experience.
The Brooks Glycerin 20 is renowned for its plush and cushioned feel.
It incorporates Brooks’ DNA Loft midsole technology, which provides exceptional softness and responsiveness.
The Glycerin 20 also features a padded collar and a plush tongue, ensuring a snug and comfortable fit around the foot.
Similarly, the Saucony Triumph 20 prioritizes comfort with its PWRRUN+ midsole technology.
This innovative cushioning system delivers a luxurious feel and optimal impact absorption.
The Triumph 20 also boasts a roomy toe box, allowing your toes to splay naturally, promoting comfort during long runs.
Cushioning and Responsiveness
Both the Brooks Glycerin 20 and the Saucony Triumph 20 excel in providing ample cushioning for a smooth and comfortable ride.
However, they differ in terms of their cushioning technologies.
The Glycerin 20 utilizes DNA Loft, which combines air, rubber, and EVA foam to offer a balance between softness and responsiveness.
This allows for a supportive yet cushioned feel throughout your runs.
The Triumph 20, on the other hand, features PWRRUN+, a lightweight and highly resilient material that provides exceptional energy return and impact absorption.
Stability and Support
Stability is a crucial aspect for runners, especially those with overpronation or under pronation.
The Brooks Glycerin 20 is designed with a neutral platform, catering to runners with a normal arch.
While it offers a stable ride, it may not be the best option for individuals requiring additional support.
In contrast, the Saucony Triumph 20 is also geared towards neutral runners but provides a touch more stability.
Its flexible and supportive design helps maintain proper alignment and reduces the risk of injuries caused by overpronation.
Also Read – Brooks Ghost 15 vs Brooks Glycerin 20: The Ultimate Comparison
Weight and Flexibility
The weight and flexibility of a running shoe can significantly impact your running performance.
The Brooks Glycerin 20 weighs slightly more than the Saucony Triumph 20.
However, this difference in weight is minimal and may not be noticeable during regular training sessions.
In terms of flexibility, the Triumph 20 offers a more flexible midsole, allowing for a natural and unrestricted foot movement.
This can be advantageous for runners seeking a shoe that adapts to their individual running style.
Durability and Outsole Traction
Durability is an important consideration, especially if you engage in regular and high-mileage running.
Both the Brooks Glycerin 20 and the Saucony Triumph 20 are constructed with durable materials that can withstand the demands of long-distance running.
The outsole traction of these shoes ensures reliable grip and traction on various surfaces.
The Glycerin 20 features an outsole made of blown rubber, strategically placed to enhance traction and durability.
The Triumph 20 incorporates Saucony’s TRI-FLEX outsole, which offers flexibility, grip, and durability, ensuring a secure footing even in challenging conditions.
Price and Value
Price is often a determining factor when selecting running shoes.
The Brooks Glycerin 20 is generally priced higher than the Saucony Triumph 20.
While both shoes deliver excellent performance and durability, the Glycerin 20’s advanced cushioning technologies and premium materials contribute to its higher price tag.
However, it’s worth noting that the Triumph 20 provides remarkable value for its price, offering a comfortable and high-performing running experience at a more affordable cost.
In conclusion, both the Brooks Glycerin 20 and the Saucony Triumph 20 are exceptional running shoes with their unique features and benefits.
The Glycerin 20 stands out for its plush cushioning and stability, while the Triumph 20 excels in comfort and responsiveness.
Ultimately, the choice between these two shoes will depend on your specific needs, preferences, and running style.
We recommend trying them on and considering factors such as fit, comfort, and performance to determine which shoe aligns best with your requirements.
Also Read – Brooks Glycerin 20 VS Brooks Levitate 5: Which is best for you?
Personal Experience with Brooks Glycerin 20 and Saucony Triumph 20
Having had the opportunity to run with both the Brooks Glycerin 20 and the Saucony Triumph 20, I can confidently say that they are both exceptional running shoes.
However, if I were to choose a favorite, it would undoubtedly be the Saucony Triumph 20.
Let me begin by sharing my experiences with the Brooks Glycerin 20.
These shoes offered a comfortable and cushioned ride that made each step feel light and smooth.
The Glycerin 20’s cushioning system provided excellent shock absorption, reducing the impact on my joints during longer runs.
The shoe’s flexibility and responsiveness were impressive, allowing me to maintain a natural and efficient stride.
The Glycerin 20 performed well on various terrains, from road runs to light trails.
I recall wearing the Glycerin 20 during a half marathon, and it provided the necessary support and comfort to help me achieve a personal record.
It truly delivered a reliable and enjoyable running experience.
Turning to the Saucony Triumph 20, this shoe quickly became my favorite due to its exceptional performance and comfort.
The Triumph 20 offered an outstanding balance of cushioning and responsiveness.
Each step felt incredibly plush and well-supported, allowing me to tackle long distances with ease.
The shoe’s cushioning system provided excellent shock absorption, minimizing fatigue on my joints even during intense training sessions.
The Triumph 20’s lightweight design and breathability were notable, keeping my feet cool and dry throughout my runs.
I remember wearing the Triumph 20 during a marathon and experiencing unmatched comfort and support, which contributed to a successful race completion and a sense of accomplishment.
While both the Brooks Glycerin 20 and the Saucony Triumph 20 have their merits, the Saucony Triumph 20 stands out as my favorite running shoe.
Its exceptional cushioning, responsiveness, and overall performance have truly enhanced my running experience.
Whether it’s long-distance races or everyday training runs, the Triumph 20 has consistently provided the comfort and support I need to perform at my best.
Ultimately, the choice between the Brooks Glycerin 20 and the Saucony Triumph 20 will depend on individual preferences, running style, and specific requirements.
Both shoes offer remarkable qualities, but the Saucony Triumph 20’s overall performance and exceptional comfort make it my personal favorite.
I encourage you to try them on and test them out on different distances and terrains to determine which shoe best suits your needs.
Also Read – Do Brooks Shoes Run True to Size? My Personal Experience
FAQs
Which shoes are best for walking Brooks Glycerin or Saucony Triumph?
The Brooks Glycerin and Saucony Triumph are both excellent options for walking, providing comfort, support, and durability.
The Glycerin tends to excel in slower-paced walks and recovery runs, offering maximum comfort and cushioning.
On the other hand, the Triumph offers versatility and can handle a range of walking speeds, making it a great option for various types of walks.
When it comes to fit, both shoes have engineered mesh uppers that provide a secure and comfortable feel.
The Glycerin offers a roomier toe box, while the Triumph offers a midfoot lockdown with its gusseted tongue.
It’s important to try on both shoes to determine which one offers the best fit for your foot shape and preferences.
In terms of weight, both shoes are slightly on the heavier side due to their plush cushioning and padding.
However, if weight is a significant concern for you, alternative options like the Brooks Ghost or Saucony Ride can offer similar features with slightly less weight.
Ultimately, the choice between the Brooks Glycerin and Saucony Triumph depends on your personal preferences, walking style, and desired level of cushioning.
Both shoes provide exceptional comfort and support, making them suitable for long walks and various walking conditions.
Try them on, walk in them, and choose the one that feels most comfortable and supportive for your feet.
What are the key differences between the Brooks Glycerin 20 and Saucony Triumph 20?
- The Brooks Glycerin 20 and Saucony Triumph 20 are both popular running shoes, but they have some distinct differences.
- The Glycerin 20 is known for its firm and stable ride, while the Triumph 20 offers a softer and more cushioned feel.
- The Glycerin 20 is slightly heavier than the Triumph 20, but the weight difference is minimal and may not significantly affect performance.
- The Glycerin 20 is designed for neutral runners, while the Triumph 20 is also suitable for those with mild overpronation.
- Both shoes provide excellent comfort, but the Triumph 20 is often praised for its luxurious and plush feel.
Which shoe is better for long-distance running, the Brooks Glycerin 20 or Saucony Triumph 20?
Both the Brooks Glycerin 20 and Saucony Triumph 20 are suitable for long-distance running, but it ultimately depends on personal preference.
The Glycerin 20’s firm and stable ride can provide a reliable platform for long runs, while the Triumph 20’s cushioning offers enhanced comfort over extended distances.
Some runners prefer the Glycerin 20 for its supportive and responsive feel, while others opt for the Triumph 20’s softer and more forgiving ride.
It is recommended to try on both shoes and take them for a test run to determine which one feels more comfortable and supportive for your specific needs.
Are the Brooks Glycerin 20 and Saucony Triumph 20 suitable for runners with high arches?
Both the Brooks Glycerin 20 and Saucony Triumph 20 are neutral running shoes and can be suitable for runners with high arches.
The Glycerin 20 offers a stable and supportive platform, which can benefit runners with high arches who may require additional support.
The Triumph 20’s cushioning provides excellent shock absorption, which can be beneficial for high-arched runners who may experience greater impact forces.
However, it is recommended for runners with high arches to try on both shoes and assess their individual comfort and support levels before making a decision.
Which shoe is better for runners with overpronation, the Brooks Glycerin 20 or Saucony Triumph 20?
The Brooks Glycerin 20 is designed for neutral runners, while the Saucony Triumph 20 can accommodate mild overpronation.
Runners with overpronation may find the Triumph 20 more suitable due to its stability features and support for the inward rolling of the foot.
The Glycerin 20 may still work for some runners with mild overpronation, but it is important to evaluate the shoe’s support and comfort during a trial run.
For runners with significant overpronation, it is advisable to consult with a specialist or podiatrist to determine the most appropriate shoe for their specific needs.
Can the Brooks Glycerin 20 and Saucony Triumph 20 be used for other activities besides running?
While the Brooks Glycerin 20 and Saucony Triumph 20 are primarily designed as running shoes, they can also be suitable for various other activities.
Both shoes provide comfort, cushioning, and support, making them viable options for walking, gym workouts, or casual wear.
However, it is important to note that the durability and outsole patterns of these shoes are optimized for running, and using them for activities with different demands may affect their longevity.
If you plan to engage in specific activities other than running, it is recommended to explore shoe options that are specifically designed for those activities to ensure optimal performance and durability.